Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm
1998-03-06 16:07:39
> I don't do this, I am comfortable with the incremental forever model).
>
> Just rename the filespaces with the server 'rename filespace' command. The
> next backup will be a full backup. The renamed filespace will be a frozen
> snapshot, the active set will never change, it will last until you delete
> the filespace. I am sure scripts could be written and it shouldn't be hard
> to implement a scheme like this.
I don't do it either, but if the client has filesystems like C:\, then
simply relabeling the disk will cause a full backup.
Steve (unVMix Systems Programmer/Dude) Roder
(tkssteve AT ubvm.cc.buffalo DOT edu | tkssteve AT acsu.buffalo DOT edu |
(716)645-3564 ,
| http://ubvm.cc.buffalo.edu/~tkssteve)
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Douglas E. Babcock
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Richard Sims
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Bill Colwell
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm,
Steven P Roder <=
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Mike Wilson
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Smith, Richard
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, David Hendrix
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, David Hendrix [SMTP:dmhendri
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Randall Eggert
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Prather, Wanda
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Richard Sims
|
|
|