Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm
1998-03-06 12:52:09
Subject: |
Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm |
From: |
"Douglas E. Babcock" <babcock AT TMD DOT COM> |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Mar 1998 11:52:09 -0600 |
At 11:05 AM 03/06/98 -0600, John Schneider wrote:
*SNIP*
>Please explain to this novice why, on the one hand, we
>implement a backup strategy to cover the possibility of loosing disks,
>be we ignore the possibility of the backup media itself going bad?
>
*SNIP*
Also, let's not forget that remote host disks do go bad, and that
performing a full restore from an "incremental forever" backup set
will usually result in a extraordinary number of tape mounts and
a correspondingly long restore window. Periodic full backups help
alleviate this problem.
Regards,
Doug
--
Doug Babcock <mailto:babcock AT tmd DOT com>
Doug Babcock <mailto:babcock AT tmd DOT com>
StorageTek TMD, a division of Storage Technology Corp.
Standard disclaimers apply (free copy on request)
To see what I/we do, visit the StorageTek CAM/EBF home page at
http://www.stortek.com/StorageTek/software/cam/camhome.html
--
=========================================================================
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm,
Douglas E. Babcock <=
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Richard Sims
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Bill Colwell
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Steven P Roder
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Kelly J. Lipp
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Mike Wilson
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Smith, Richard
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, Tim Dobrowolsky
- Re: The "incremental forever" paradigm, David Hendrix
|
|
|