Networker

Re: [Networker] encrypted clone only?

2010-05-26 11:20:02
Subject: Re: [Networker] encrypted clone only?
From: Alex Alexiou <AAlexiou AT TARGETSITE DOT COM>
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 11:17:27 -0400
Yeah, EMC confirmed this as well. Not surprising. Thanks for the help

-----Original Message-----
From: EMC NetWorker discussion [mailto:NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU] On
Behalf Of rovinabi
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:38 PM
To: NETWORKER AT LISTSERV.TEMPLE DOT EDU
Subject: [Networker] encrypted clone only?

Hi,
   To answer your second question, there is no way you can encrypt data
only during cloning process. Since encryption is implemented using
directives in NetWorker it can on;y be done during backup and not during
the cloning process. As for the first question that you had, I believe
that you will have to make 2 consecutive full backups first to tape and
the next to your Data Domain.

HTH,
Rovin D'Souza.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by rovinabishek.dsouza AT mphasis DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this
list. You can access the archives at
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and 
type "signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to 
networker-request AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this 
list. You can access the archives at 
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>