Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?
2007-01-15 13:37:11
On Jan 15, 2007, at 1:14 PM, Curtis Preston wrote:
I completely agree with not doing them at the same time. Any thoughts
as to which way is better?
1. Upgrade NetWorker
2. Wait a few backup cycles
3. Upgrade hardware
Or
1. Upgrade hardware
2. Wait a few backup cycles
3. Upgrade NetWorker
The second option is what makes the most sense for anyone who is
about to upgrade to new hardware. Why spend time upgrading NetWorker
software on old hardware and testing it only to
move to new hardware after the testing period is over?
To sign off this list, send email to listserv AT listserv.temple DOT edu and type
"signoff networker" in the body of the email. Please write to networker-request
AT listserv.temple DOT edu if you have any problems with this list. You can access the
archives at http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/networker.html or
via RSS at http://listserv.temple.edu/cgi-bin/wa?RSS&L=NETWORKER
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Manel Rodero
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?,
Stan Horwitz <=
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, John Stoffel
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Werth, Dave
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Curtis Preston
- Re: [Networker] Hardware and software upgrade, which version?, Kiely, Vincent
|
|
|