Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula feedback about documentation

2017-02-08 19:28:57
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula feedback about documentation
From: Phil Stracchino <phils AT caerllewys DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2017 19:27:55 -0500
On 02/08/17 19:09, Serge Pouliquen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Currently, I'm not a user of bacula and I'm only reading the 
> documentation in order to determine which backup solution I will choose.
> 
> I'm planning to set a backup for my personal computer, no server in 
> schedule at the moment.
> 
> A simple solution could be enough and not too expensive in time.
> 
> I was interested in bacula with SQLite, but looks unreliable according 
> to documentation.

[...]

> It is good to warn about SQLite, but what is current status ?
> Documentation of version 5.0.x contains "similar" informations. It may 
> have changed, but maybe not.

It is my understanding that SQLite support was removed some time ago
because it just didn't work adequately.  SQlite was never designed for
the kind of load an application like Bacula puts on it.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  phils AT caerllewys DOT net
  phil AT co.ordinate DOT org
  Landline: 603.293.8485

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>