I ran another iperf test that gives me better numbers, it is as follows

justin@ubuntu:/etc/bacula$ iperf -c xxx.xxx.xx.xxx -p 9102 -i 2 -t 60
------------------------------------------------------------
Client connecting to xxx.xxx.xx.xxx, TCP port 9102

TCP window size: 22.8 KByte (default)
------------------------------------------------------------

[  3] local yyy.yyy.y.yyy port 43284 connected with xxx.xxx.xx.xxx port 9102
[ ID] Interval       Transfer     Bandwidth
[  3]  0.0- 2.0 sec  1.38 MBytes  5.77 Mbits/sec
[  3]  2.0- 4.0 sec  1.25 MBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
[  3]  4.0- 6.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3]  6.0- 8.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3]  8.0-10.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 10.0-12.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 12.0-14.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 14.0-16.0 sec  1.25 MBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
[  3] 16.0-18.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 18.0-20.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 20.0-22.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 22.0-24.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 24.0-26.0 sec  1.00 MBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
[  3] 26.0-28.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 28.0-30.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 30.0-32.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 32.0-34.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 34.0-36.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 36.0-38.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 38.0-40.0 sec  1.25 MBytes  5.24 Mbits/sec
[  3] 40.0-42.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 42.0-44.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 44.0-46.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 46.0-48.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 48.0-50.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 50.0-52.0 sec  1.00 MBytes  4.19 Mbits/sec
[  3] 52.0-54.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 54.0-56.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 56.0-58.0 sec  1.12 MBytes  4.72 Mbits/sec
[  3] 58.0-60.0 sec  1.38 MBytes  5.77 Mbits/sec
[  3]  0.0-60.7 sec  34.5 MBytes  4.77 Mbits/sec

Am I reading this correctly in that this is a network issue? The iperf is showing about the same transfer rate as I'm seeing on Bacula.  Any suggestions on where to start looking to increase this?

My client side has a VoIP system and I think we have QoS setup, could that be causing it?

Thanks,

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by bphillips AT bpwgroup DOT com via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100% visibility into your
Java,.NET, & PHP application. Start your 15-day FREE TRIAL of AppDynamics Pro!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=84349351&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users