>>>>> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:49:04 +0200, Laurent Papier said:
> 
> On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:31:29 -0600
> Greg Woods <greg AT gregandeva DOT net> wrote:
> 
> > Last night I modified the FileSet for my main house server. I got the
> > Windows version of Bacula running inside the Windows 7 virtual machine,
> > so that I don't have to copy the entire 12GB virtual disk image on every
> > incremental backup of the server, plus I get the ability to restore
> > individual files. So what I changed in the FileSet was only to add an
> > exclusion for the virtual disk image file.
> > 
> > This resulted in the next incremental backup turning into a Full. Is
> > that expected behavior? Does any modification of the FileSet invalidate
> > all the previously-stored catalog entries for that client?
> > 
> 
> Yes, this is the expected behaviour. If you don't want a Full backup after 
> modifying a fileset add:
> Ignore FileSet Changes = yes
> 
> in the fileset definition.

Be very careful when doing this after adding something to the fileset though,
because you will get an incomplete backup (unless you are using the Accurate
option).

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get 100% visibility into Java/.NET code with AppDynamics Lite!
It's a free troubleshooting tool designed for production.
Get down to code-level detail for bottlenecks, with <2% overhead. 
Download for free and get started troubleshooting in minutes. 
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48897031&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users