Bacula-users

[Bacula-users] recommendations for failover system backups

2011-10-05 15:41:08
Subject: [Bacula-users] recommendations for failover system backups
From: Ben Walton <bwalton AT artsci.utoronto DOT ca>
To: Bacula Users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 2011 15:39:25 -0400
Hi All,

I'm going to be adding a new pair of boxes to the network shortly.
One box will be a primary server and the other a hot standby.  The hot
standby will sync the live system nightly.

As I see it, I've got a few options for backup here:

1. Backup both boxes, pay the heavy price of duplicated data (or use a
   base job, etc)
2. Backup only the failover system and the config for the live system,
   making the failover the primary recovery source.
3. Backup only the primary system and config on the failover.
4. Attempt to backup only a single system, determined by which one is
   holder the virtual IP that will run the service.

I'm inclined toward either 2 or 3 but am curious what the experts
think.

Thanks
-Ben
--
Ben Walton
Systems Programmer - CHASS
University of Toronto
C:416.407.5610 | W:416.978.4302


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>