On 6/30/11 2:34 PM, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 11:04:34AM -0700, Mehma Sarja wrote:
>
>> I submit to you an updated Ubuntu 10.10 install script which works for
>> me on a 64 bit machine.
> [...]
>
> What's wrong with `aptitude install bacula`?
> In case you desperately need 5.0.3 over 5.0.2 from meerkat, what's wrong
> with backporting a 5.0.3 package from a more recent OS release?
>
I did not know that existed. But there are a couple of things wrong with 
apt-get install bacula. The choices are confusing and the hit and miss 
approach leaves a broken install. apt-get install selects some odd 
places to put bacula config files. I could not find any control files, 
eg bacula-ctl-dir, on the system. I could not get postgresql to switch 
modes to sql_ascii from utf8. I don't know what a "postgresql server 
dev" package installs other than to satisfy the libpq need. What a 
headache to save typing a few commands and compile the thing.

Besides a native compile is always good, eh? It is clean and simple and 
you control what functionality to compile in. It also gives one some 
practice skills for when the time cometh and we go looking for the usr 
local etc directory to run the upgrade commands.

Mehma

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security 
threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes 
sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users