Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula admin tool and bacula services version
2011-06-10 03:36:19
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 11:54:19 -0400, John Drescher wrote:
>> Wich Bat (bacula admin tool) should I have for use with each
>> bacula-dir
>> (isn't it the service it connects to?)?. Is there a matrix of
>> compatibilities or similar?. I have had some problems compiling bat
>> in
>> Solaris for example... so I'm planning having one central BAT for
>> accessing all bacula servers... but I'd need to know wich version
>> of
>> them is compatible with the other one.
>>
>
> I would use 5.0.3 for bat and all servers until 5.1 is released this
> summer. This will be the most stable. I do not believe a newer bat is
> backward compatible with older servers, I believe there were some
> protocol changes that make this not work.
>
> John
Hi John,
Thanks a lot for you're response. So, it's not recommended to use a
version of bat with inferior or superior version bacula services?. It's
better to use the own shipped version with each source version?.
Thanks a lot.
Bye!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|