Le 08/06/2011 19:16, Gavin McCullagh a écrit :
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2011, Jérôme Blion wrote:
>
>> You will see performance improvements if you have lot of concurrents
>> updates.
> I don't imagine concurrent updates are really an issue for us.  Our backups
> run fast enough generally for our purposes .  I daresay they could be
> faster, but they're not causing us a problem.  It's the time for a restore
> to build the file tree that's a problem.
>
> The particularly bad restore in question is a Cyrus IMAP server with about
> 5 million files in a full backup.  The worst case would be a monthly full,
> a weekly differential and 6 days of incrementals to assemble.
>
> Gavin
What tool do you use to perform restore ?
I had such issues with BAT... With Webacula, I am not able to reproduce 
this behaviour.
Perhaps a bad query which does not use an index.

HTH.
Jérôme Blion.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users