Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres

2011-06-06 21:48:01
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] MySQL versus Postgres
From: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 21:26:22 -0400
On 06/06/11 20:57, James Harper wrote:
>>
>> A decent set of RAID0 SSD's for spooling/despooling data and will be
> perfect!.
>>
> 
> Are there any performance implications for SSD's when they get
> fragmented?

Not enough so to notice.  SSDs are direct access; no address takes any
longer to access than any other.  There is no seek time, only a fixed
access time.  Accessing two blocks at opposite ends of the address space
takes no longer than accessing two almost-adjacent blocks.  (Accessing
two *adjacent* blocks is, of course, fractionally faster because you
just do it in a single streaming read, but in practical terms you'll
never notice the difference.)


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
  Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, SQL wrangler, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>