All,
I'm still doing some testing with Bacula in my new environment. After
one week of backups, Bacula is storing approximately 25,000,000 files
(10 TB of data). Our other 5 TBs of data is not in Bacula yet, but will
be soon. Our 15 TB of total data will also grow by 50% each year.
Postgres seems to be handling the current amount of data decently for us
thus far. I just want to make sure that Postgres is the right choice
(performance-wise) before I push forward with this solution.
I recently read that Postgres is recommended over MySQL for larger
Bacula installations. I just wanted to get your thoughts on that.
BTW, the current environment lives inside ESX, but the new environment
will live on a dedicated box with the following specs:
- Dell PE 1950 III
- 32 GB of RAM
- 2 x 300 GB SAS 15K RAID 1
- 2-drive FC LTO-4 TL4000 library for copying File storage to tape
- SAN-attached LUNS for spooling and File storage
Thanks,
Mike
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger.
Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe,
secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about.
Get your free trial download today.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
