On 02/01/11 15:59, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> at the moment I still use HP' Ultrium 448 LTO-2 drive and hope it will
> work for some more time (those devices are not cheap for soho/home
> usage).
>
> However, I'm aware one day we'll have to 'upgrade' (probably to
> LTO-4), but I'm curious what is the opinion of Bacula community about
> the quality of LTO devices made by HP vs IBM?
Personally I've had better luck with IBM drives. In these post-Fiorina
days, my faith in the HP name is limited.
--
Phil Stracchino, CDK#2 DoD#299792458 ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
alaric AT caerllewys DOT net alaric AT metrocast DOT net phil AT
co.ordinate DOT org
Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
It's not the years, it's the mileage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|