Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] HP or IBM LTO drive

2011-02-01 17:34:40
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] HP or IBM LTO drive
From: Phil Stracchino <alaric AT metrocast DOT net>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 17:32:13 -0500
On 02/01/11 15:59, Arunav Mandal wrote:
> at the moment I still use HP' Ultrium 448 LTO-2 drive and hope it will
> work for some more time (those devices are not cheap for soho/home
> usage).
>  
> However, I'm aware one day we'll have to 'upgrade' (probably to
> LTO-4), but I'm curious what is the opinion of Bacula community about
> the quality of LTO devices made by HP vs IBM?

Personally I've had better luck with IBM drives.  In these post-Fiorina
days, my faith in the HP name is limited.


-- 
  Phil Stracchino, CDK#2     DoD#299792458     ICBM: 43.5607, -71.355
  alaric AT caerllewys DOT net   alaric AT metrocast DOT net   phil AT 
co.ordinate DOT org
         Renaissance Man, Unix ronin, Perl hacker, Free Stater
                 It's not the years, it's the mileage.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires 
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY! 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>