Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Backups

2011-01-08 18:55:00
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Virtual Backups
From: "Gandalf Corvotempesta" <newsletter-ale AT guest DOT net>
To: <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: 09 Jan 2011 00:52:12 +0100
-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: penne296 AT sapo DOT pt
Inviata: Sab, 08 Gennaio 2011 01:22:46

> i have the same problem and i could not find a satisfactory solution.
>
> so i tried to use a virtual autocharger but bacula support is buggy:
> 
> see the thread "virtualfull using tapes" or my previous post a few  
> month ago "bug ? bacula asks for a volume that is already mounted"
>
> so far virtuallfulls with bacula are do not seem to be production  
> ready sadly ....

my bacula is not asking for an already mounted volume but is trying
to read a volume using the wrong storage.

Actually, the first virtualfull is made reading from the fullpull and
writing to the nextpool.

nextpool has it's own storage defined.

the first virtualfull will be executed ok, but the second virtualfull, will try
to read the first virtualfull by using the storage defined from the full poll 
instead the one specified in nextpool

i've tried to move virtualfull from it's dedicated poll to the standard full 
poll, but i have the same results.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>