Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives

2011-01-08 14:13:18
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] VirtualFull using tape drives
From: Jesper Krogh <jesper AT krogh DOT cc>
To: James Harper <james.harper AT bendigoit.com DOT au>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2011 20:03:55 +0100
On 2011-01-06 23:00, James Harper wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Anyone doing VirtualFull backups using tapedrives only?
>> Can they shortly describe their setup? pro/con/etc?
>>
> I'm not, but can tell you it's probably not a good idea - you'd end up
> with extra wear and tear on your tape drives, as well as greatly reduced
> performance while the target tape drive waited for data to be read from
> your source tape drive(s).
>
> I do a weekly full to do disk, then 3 x daily incremental to disk, and
> then a virtual full to tape every night (for DR purposes). Disk space is
> cheap, and you could easily build a disk array that could keep your
> tapedrive fed with data for much less than the cost of another tape
> drive (and tapes).

A quick count shows that my current Incremental-Pool holds around 350TB
worth of data, both in terms of cost, infrastructure and handling tapes
are way better at that scale.

If I could cut significantly on the retention times, then a disk solution
might be favorable.

Jesper
-- 
Jesper


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gaining the trust of online customers is vital for the success of any company
that requires sensitive data to be transmitted over the Web.   Learn how to 
best implement a security strategy that keeps consumers' information secure 
and instills the confidence they need to proceed with transactions.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnl 
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users