Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Interesting performance observation

2010-12-06 10:45:05
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Interesting performance observation
From: Josh Fisher <jfisher AT pvct DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:41:55 -0500
On 12/5/2010 9:20 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
> Bacula 5.0.2. This is not a problem; just an observation.
>
> I do backups to disk only, using six RAID arrays for storage, totalling
> 45TB physical disk. Originally I used six pools and six devices, but ran
> into disk space management issues. This setup was converted to one device
> and one pool per client (about 50). Backups are compressed and TLS is used
> (storage is offsite). No other changes were made: backup throughput
> performance almost exactly doubled.

If multiple jobs were running simultaneously with the 6 device setup, 
then that would skew the results of a direct job-to-job comparison.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>