On Mon, 6 Dec 2010, Josh Fisher wrote:

> On 12/5/2010 9:20 AM, Steve Thompson wrote:
>> Bacula 5.0.2. This is not a problem; just an observation.
>>
>> I do backups to disk only, using six RAID arrays for storage, totalling
>> 45TB physical disk. Originally I used six pools and six devices, but ran
>> into disk space management issues. This setup was converted to one device
>> and one pool per client (about 50). Backups are compressed and TLS is used
>> (storage is offsite). No other changes were made: backup throughput
>> performance almost exactly doubled.
>
> If multiple jobs were running simultaneously with the 6 device setup,
> then that would skew the results of a direct job-to-job comparison.

Yes, this is true. However, the jobs themselves, and their schedules, were
not changed; the same concurrency was in place both before and after.

Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve Thompson                 E-mail:      smt AT vgersoft DOT com
Voyager Software LLC           Web:         http://www DOT vgersoft DOT com
39 Smugglers Path              VSW Support: support AT vgersoft DOT com
Ithaca, NY 14850
   "186,282 miles per second: it's not just a good idea, it's the law"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What happens now with your Lotus Notes apps - do you make another costly 
upgrade, or settle for being marooned without product support? Time to move
off Lotus Notes and onto the cloud with Force.com, apps are easier to build,
use, and manage than apps on traditional platforms. Sign up for the Lotus 
Notes Migration Kit to learn more. http://p.sf.net/sfu/salesforce-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users