Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 08:19:40
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason
From: Martin Simmons <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:16:47 +0100
>>>>> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300, Silver Salonen said:
> 
> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote:
> > Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> > > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote:
> > >> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> > >>> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote:
> > >>>> Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> > >>>>> Hello.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup 
> > >>>>> that has no full backup in its schedule:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Schedule {
> > >>>>>         Name = Archive
> > >>>>>         Run = Level=Differential 1st fri at 23:05
> > >>>>>         Run = Level=Incremental 2nd-5th fri at 23:05
> > >>>>>         Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at 23:05
> > >>>>> }
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The job builds its fileset dynamically with "/usr/bin/find 
> > >>>>> /path/to/backup -type f -mtime +90d -print" - it takes a while, but 
> > >>>>> does its job. From time-to-time the job just gets upgraded to full.. 
> > >>>>> like today:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 
> > >>>>> 9135: No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. Doing FULL 
> > >>>>> backup.
> > >>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: Start Backup JobId 9135, 
> > >>>>> Job=userdata-archive.2010-09-13_23.05.01_05
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Any ideas why this happens?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Is there a way to continue with incremental backups once such a full 
> > >>>>> backup has been cancelled (eg. modifying Bacula DB manually)? It 
> > >>>>> would really hurt to start from scratch with this archive.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Hi,
> > >>>>
> > >>>> did you set "Ignore FileSet Changes = yes" in your FileSet's
> > >>>> "Options"-Section? If not, the job level will be elevated to full, if
> > >>>> the FileSet changes.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Christian Manal
> > >>>
> > >>> Yes I did. Otherwise the job would be upgraded to full every time :)
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> Well, it could have been, that the dynamically generated FileSet only
> > >> changes now and then.
> > > 
> > > The dataset is big enough to contain at least a modified file for every 
> > > day :)
> > > 
> > >>> This upgrade happened now after 35 days, ie the full backup was done 35 
> > >>> days ago, on 10th of August. Meanwhile only incrementals/differentials 
> > >>> were done.
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> What about your retention periods? Maybe the job or volume of the last
> > >> full backup got pruned.
> > > 
> > > Retention period of the full volume is 10 years. The client's file and 
> > > job retention periods are 6 months. So I don't think configuration of any 
> > > of these parameters' could have caused that.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Silver
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Then I'm out of ideas. Sorry.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Christian Manal
> 
> Thanks anyway. Any other ideas anyone?

Is the Full job still shown by the list jobs command (i.e. is it still in the
catalog at all)?

What did the last successful incremental print for the "Backup Level" in the
log.  It should give a date.

__Martin

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>