Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason
2010-09-14 06:52:20
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote:
> Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote:
> >> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> >>> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote:
> >>>> Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> >>>>> Hello.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup
> >>>>> that has no full backup in its schedule:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Schedule {
> >>>>> Name = Archive
> >>>>> Run = Level=Differential 1st fri at 23:05
> >>>>> Run = Level=Incremental 2nd-5th fri at 23:05
> >>>>> Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at 23:05
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The job builds its fileset dynamically with "/usr/bin/find
> >>>>> /path/to/backup -type f -mtime +90d -print" - it takes a while, but
> >>>>> does its job. From time-to-time the job just gets upgraded to full..
> >>>>> like today:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135:
> >>>>> No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. Doing FULL backup.
> >>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: Start Backup JobId 9135,
> >>>>> Job=userdata-archive.2010-09-13_23.05.01_05
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any ideas why this happens?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there a way to continue with incremental backups once such a full
> >>>>> backup has been cancelled (eg. modifying Bacula DB manually)? It would
> >>>>> really hurt to start from scratch with this archive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> did you set "Ignore FileSet Changes = yes" in your FileSet's
> >>>> "Options"-Section? If not, the job level will be elevated to full, if
> >>>> the FileSet changes.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Christian Manal
> >>>
> >>> Yes I did. Otherwise the job would be upgraded to full every time :)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, it could have been, that the dynamically generated FileSet only
> >> changes now and then.
> >
> > The dataset is big enough to contain at least a modified file for every day
> > :)
> >
> >>> This upgrade happened now after 35 days, ie the full backup was done 35
> >>> days ago, on 10th of August. Meanwhile only incrementals/differentials
> >>> were done.
> >>>
> >>
> >> What about your retention periods? Maybe the job or volume of the last
> >> full backup got pruned.
> >
> > Retention period of the full volume is 10 years. The client's file and job
> > retention periods are 6 months. So I don't think configuration of any of
> > these parameters' could have caused that.
> >
> > --
> > Silver
> >
>
>
> Then I'm out of ideas. Sorry.
>
> Regards,
> Christian Manal
Thanks anyway. Any other ideas anyone?
I'm thinking on restoring Bacula DB to dump made 2 days ago and see if it
allows incrementals run again.. a desparate move, I guess ;)
--
Silver
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Christian Manal
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Christian Manal
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Christian Manal
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason,
Silver Salonen <=
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Bruno Friedmann
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Silver Salonen
- Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason, Martin Simmons
|
|
|