Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason

2010-09-14 06:52:20
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] backup upgraded to FULL for no apparent reason
From: Silver Salonen <silver AT ultrasoft DOT ee>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:49:59 +0300
On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:59:09 Christian Manal wrote:
> Am 14.09.2010 09:53, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> > On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:41:38 Christian Manal wrote:
> >> Am 14.09.2010 09:30, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> >>> On Tuesday 14 September 2010 10:13:49 Christian Manal wrote:
> >>>> Am 14.09.2010 08:36, schrieb Silver Salonen:
> >>>>> Hello.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I use Bacula 5.0.2 on FreeBSD 8.0. I have a huge archive-type backup 
> >>>>> that has no full backup in its schedule:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Schedule {
> >>>>>         Name = Archive
> >>>>>         Run = Level=Differential 1st fri at 23:05
> >>>>>         Run = Level=Incremental 2nd-5th fri at 23:05
> >>>>>         Run = Level=Incremental sat-thu at 23:05
> >>>>> }
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The job builds its fileset dynamically with "/usr/bin/find 
> >>>>> /path/to/backup -type f -mtime +90d -print" - it takes a while, but 
> >>>>> does its job. From time-to-time the job just gets upgraded to full.. 
> >>>>> like today:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: 
> >>>>> No prior or suitable Full backup found in catalog. Doing FULL backup.
> >>>>> 13-Sep 23:05 velvet-dir JobId 9135: Start Backup JobId 9135, 
> >>>>> Job=userdata-archive.2010-09-13_23.05.01_05
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Any ideas why this happens?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is there a way to continue with incremental backups once such a full 
> >>>>> backup has been cancelled (eg. modifying Bacula DB manually)? It would 
> >>>>> really hurt to start from scratch with this archive.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>>> did you set "Ignore FileSet Changes = yes" in your FileSet's
> >>>> "Options"-Section? If not, the job level will be elevated to full, if
> >>>> the FileSet changes.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Christian Manal
> >>>
> >>> Yes I did. Otherwise the job would be upgraded to full every time :)
> >>>
> >>
> >> Well, it could have been, that the dynamically generated FileSet only
> >> changes now and then.
> > 
> > The dataset is big enough to contain at least a modified file for every day 
> > :)
> > 
> >>> This upgrade happened now after 35 days, ie the full backup was done 35 
> >>> days ago, on 10th of August. Meanwhile only incrementals/differentials 
> >>> were done.
> >>>
> >>
> >> What about your retention periods? Maybe the job or volume of the last
> >> full backup got pruned.
> > 
> > Retention period of the full volume is 10 years. The client's file and job 
> > retention periods are 6 months. So I don't think configuration of any of 
> > these parameters' could have caused that.
> > 
> > --
> > Silver
> > 
> 
> 
> Then I'm out of ideas. Sorry.
> 
> Regards,
> Christian Manal

Thanks anyway. Any other ideas anyone?

I'm thinking on restoring Bacula DB to dump made 2 days ago and see if it 
allows incrementals run again.. a desparate move, I guess ;)

--
Silver

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users