Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling and backup concept

2010-08-26 07:53:57
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Spooling and backup concept
From: Steve Thompson <smt AT vgersoft DOT com>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 07:51:56 -0400 (EDT)
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010, me AT free-minds DOT net wrote:

> 1) do we really need to spool? We are not writing to real tapes, we have a
> filesystem as backend (ext3 over glusterfs).

I am one of those that believes spooling to be useful even when writing 
backups to disk; it is obviously not in question that it's good when 
writing to tape. I see the advantages as having the backup volumes less 
fragmented than when writing directly without a spool, especially when 
running many concurrent job, and this increases restoration performance. 
In some scenarios, the spool may be faster anyway; for example, at home I 
spool jobs to a collection of SCSI drives with the pools situated on a set 
of ATA and USB drives (and btw, USB drives are sooooooo slow).

Steve

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users 
worldwide. Take advantage of special opportunities to increase revenue and 
speed time-to-market. Join now, and jumpstart your future.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-atom-d2d
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users