Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Postgres : copy batch problem

2010-08-03 22:19:08
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Postgres : copy batch problem
From: Dan Langille <dan AT langille DOT org>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 03 Aug 2010 22:15:48 -0400
On 8/3/2010 7:09 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:

> Yes, a batch insert is faster than a specfic insert, but the latter
> should be done at the "written-to-tape" transaction time, and could be
> done asynchronously, but in a transaction. Its pretty crazy for a>7TB
> tape backup to fail because of a temporary file/table problem at the END
> of the backup process rather than during it.

Perhaps this will help:

  * batch insert determines the method to be used.

  * Spool Attributes determines when this method is used.

Does that help?

-- 
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>