Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula + Postgres : copy batch problem
2010-08-03 22:19:08
On 8/3/2010 7:09 PM, Rory Campbell-Lange wrote:
> Yes, a batch insert is faster than a specfic insert, but the latter
> should be done at the "written-to-tape" transaction time, and could be
> done asynchronously, but in a transaction. Its pretty crazy for a>7TB
> tape backup to fail because of a temporary file/table problem at the END
> of the backup process rather than during it.
Perhaps this will help:
* batch insert determines the method to be used.
* Spool Attributes determines when this method is used.
Does that help?
--
Dan Langille - http://langille.org/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the
Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share
of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|
|
|