Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Odd Bacula article

2009-07-21 02:33:09
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Odd Bacula article
From: Mike Ruskai <thannyd AT earthlink DOT net>
To: Bacula Users <bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 02:28:37 -0400
On 7/20/2009 9:32 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> I found this today:
>
> http://searchstorage.techtarget.com.au/articles/34020-Open-source-backup-tools-Amanda-BackupPC-and-Bacula-compared
>
> However, very little comparison is done.
>
> The Bacula information is based upon writings by Eric Burgener, but I
> can find no material referencing his work.
>
> Offhand, the article mentions two solutions in passing and dismisses
> them.  Then it glows on about Amanada.  :)
>
> At first, I thought the article was outdated, but I could find no
> evidence that it was a republished work.
>
>    
The article cites someone choosing Amanda over Bacula in 2005, because 
of product maturity.  I looked at Amanda back around then, and gave it 
up for useless since it was completely incapable of such basic 
functionality as spanning a job across multiple tapes, or writing more 
than one job to a single tape.  That's a mature product?


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>