John Drescher escribió:
> You do not want concurrent jobs on your LTO3 but you do with your
> disk? I would have it the other way since disk is generally slower
> than tape. Not using compression with the disk?
> 
> 
> BTW, I do not know the answer to your real question. I have my disk
> storage on a different machine than my 2 drive autochager.
> 
> John

Hi John, thanks for the reply, do you do backups at the same time in 
both of your autochangers? If so, I guess I'd need 2 storage daemons in 
the same machine to make concurrent backups to different devices.

As for the LTO3, i'll possibly go for concurrent backups "everywhere", 
that'll be easier than having 2 storage daemons on the same machine. I 
didn't do it before because I wanted to keep straight easily recoverable 
tapes, instead of having interleaved data on them.

Thanks & Cheers,
-- 
José E. Molina



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users