---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] OT: More about concurrent jobs...
To: "Jose E. Molina" <jmolina AT brujula DOT es>


On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 5:42 AM, Jose E. Molina<jmolina AT brujula DOT es> 
wrote:
> John Drescher escribió:
>> You do not want concurrent jobs on your LTO3 but you do with your
>> disk? I would have it the other way since disk is generally slower
>> than tape. Not using compression with the disk?
>>
>>
>> BTW, I do not know the answer to your real question. I have my disk
>> storage on a different machine than my 2 drive autochager.
>>
>> John
>
> Hi John, thanks for the reply, do you do backups at the same time in
> both of your autochangers? If so, I guess I'd need 2 storage daemons in
> the same machine to make concurrent backups to different devices.
>
> As for the LTO3, i'll possibly go for concurrent backups "everywhere",
> that'll be easier than having 2 storage daemons on the same machine. I
> didn't do it before because I wanted to keep straight easily recoverable
> tapes, instead of having interleaved data on them.
>

Its a 2 drive autochanger and I have only 1 storage daemon. I achieve
concurrency on each drive and I also use both drives at the same time.

John



-- 
John M. Drescher

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users