Well, I've got "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 3", so it looks like the duplicate
job control does quite the same as "Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1", which is
weird enough :)
PS. I haven't tried or tested this more, so maybe we're missing smth.
--
Silver
On Monday 04 May 2009 20:44:22 Stephen Thompson wrote:
>
> That's the behaviour I've seen when I set Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 1
> under JobDefs. Then only one job with the same name can run at a time.
> What I was hoping for with duplicate job control was for the subsequent
> job(s) to be canceled so that they wouldn't run at all.
>
> thanks,
> Stephen
>
>
>
> Silver Salonen wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > I noticed one thing today.. a big full backup was ran on friday, so it
wasn't
> > completed 24 hours later, but when the next job's time arrived, it wasn't
run.
> > I was very surprised, because I expected it to run as it has been the case
> > without "allow duplicate jobs = no" with Bacula 2.x. When the full job
> > completed, the scheduled (and not run) one started immediately and was
> > correctly making an incremental backup.
> >
> > So it seems that duplicate job control does work, just not the way I
expected,
> > ie. I expected it to being cancelled (I guess I thought it's the "Cancel
> > Queued Duplicates" directive, but now, I guess not) instead of being
hidden
> > and waiting somewhere back there.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
|