On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Andreas Thienemann <andreas AT bawue DOT net> 
wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, John Drescher wrote:
>
>> > But seriously, you're not going to tell me that the bacula-dir process is
>> > going to need 2.6 GB of memory because of a few messages?
>> >
>> When I replied I did think of that. That is quite excessive, I was
>> thinking thousands of messages but enough to equal 2.6GB would be way
>> too many..
>
> Exactly my thoughts. That would be excessive.
>
> I'm sure that bacula is keeping some state in memory and it's growing...
> But it shouldn't be that much IMHO.
>

This is probably a bug caused by a condition that is not tested by the
developers very often if ever. I mean 230 jobs blocking for days
waiting for user intervention. Not something that I would test often..
John

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users