On Sun, 19 Apr 2009, John Drescher wrote:

> > But seriously, you're not going to tell me that the bacula-dir process is
> > going to need 2.6 GB of memory because of a few messages?
> >
> When I replied I did think of that. That is quite excessive, I was
> thinking thousands of messages but enough to equal 2.6GB would be way
> too many..

Exactly my thoughts. That would be excessive.

I'm sure that bacula is keeping some state in memory and it's growing... 
But it shouldn't be that much IMHO.

regards,
 andreas

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users