Bacula-users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bacula-users] lstat - how much of it do we actually NEED? (Comments please)

2009-04-16 11:21:53
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] lstat - how much of it do we actually NEED? (Comments please)
From: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: Kjetil Torgrim Homme <kjetilho AT linpro DOT no>, bacula-users <Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:16:54 -0400 
> (I'm dreading the switch to 3.0...  I seriously doubt I'll be able to
> do it in 24 hours, and I don't like the thought of a day without
> backups.  but we'll see.)
>

BTW, you do not have to upgrade clients so only the director and sds
are needed to be upgraded.


-- 
John M. Drescher

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Bacula-users] decoding lstat data, Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Next by Date:  Re: [Bacula-users] lstat - how much of it do we actually NEED? (Comments please), Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Bacula-users] lstat - how much of it do we actually NEED? (Comments please), Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Next by Thread:  Re: [Bacula-users] lstat - how much of it do we actually NEED? (Comments please), Kjetil Torgrim Homme
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]