Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 3.0 not asking for tape to be mounted

2009-04-16 07:57:50
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 3.0 not asking for tape to be mounted
From: Arno Lehmann <al AT its-lehmann DOT de>
To: bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:53:15 +0200
Hi,

16.04.2009 09:45, Stephen Carr wrote:
> Dear All
> 
> Each week I rotate through a set of tapes. I unmounted and ejected tape 
> from one set. Placed first tape of next set in unit but forgot to mount it.

That's the key issue - Bacula doesn't notify for unmounted devices as 
it assumes the operator knows what he's doing. Unfortunately, that 
might well be, but errors still happen...

One solution would be a simple monitoring... for example using Nagios, 
you could monitor for unmounted devices and notify after one hour of 
not being mounted. Sounds like a fun thing to implement... quite 
simple, I think.

> A migration job started but never sent an email to mount a tape. The 
> devices was flagged as BLOCKED.
> 
> When migration jobs fill the tape there is a message to mount a new tape 
> etc.

Because the device is, at that time, still mounted.

> Is this a bug?

No, a feature, but, admittedly, one that can bite ;-)

Arno

> Thanks
> Stephen Carr
> 

-- 
Arno Lehmann
IT-Service Lehmann
Sandstr. 6, 49080 Osnabrück
www.its-lehmann.de

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and 
around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save
$200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco.
300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. 
Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>