On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 3:37 AM, John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com> 
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 8:19 PM, Andreas Schuldei
> Concurrency will work great. I have been using it in the way I
> described for 5 years with bacula. I mean with a small spool size and
> several concurrent jobs.  At one point I was doing this with a single
> DLT-IV drive but now I have a 2 drive 24 slot LTO2 autochanger. It
> works great for me with a small spool size. Basically each job works
> to fill its 5GB spool and then these 5GB spools go to tape when they
> are ready.

i would like to use something like that. i would be interested in how
to change my "no concurrency - no spool - to disk" setup to be more
like yours.

my datavolume would be two orders of magnitude higher, but i dont
think that would be a problem, would it?
would that mean that the database be more in the 3Tbyte range, then?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment.
Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users