Dan Langille wrote:
> On Jan 22, 2009, at 6:54 PM, Kern Sibbald wrote:
> 
>> On Thursday 22 January 2009 23:59:26 Dan Langille wrote:
>>> This sounds clever.  Hard to do?
>>>
>> No, it is essentially the same a item 24 in the projects file.   
>> since it was
>> 24 on the last vote, given the items above it, unfortunately we are  
>> unlikely
>> to get to it any time soon, even though many of the items above it  
>> have
>> already been completed for version 3.0.0
> 
> Is that the right number?  24?
> 
> http://www.bacula.org/en/?page=projects
> 
> Item 24:  Add an override in Schedule for Pools based on backup types.

It looks like it's item 24 on the latest projects file:

http://bacula.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/bacula/trunk/bacula/projects?view=markup

Perhaps the projects link on the main page should be updated to point to this
version instead?

-- 
Frank Sweetser fs at wpi.edu  |  For every problem, there is a solution that
WPI Senior Network Engineer   |  is simple, elegant, and wrong. - HL Mencken
    GPG fingerprint = 6174 1257 129E 0D21 D8D4  E8A3 8E39 29E3 E2E8 8CEC

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users