Bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed

2009-01-14 13:29:01
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula giving slow speed
From: Michael Galloway <mgx AT ornl DOT gov>
To: John Drescher <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:26:13 -0500
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:53:13AM -0500, John Drescher wrote:
> >> 3. There is no database backup as such. What we do is just take the
> >> system level full backup.
> >>
> >
> > I believe he was suggesting that the Bacula catalog database might be stored
> > on the same file system that is being backed up. Since Bacula must write to
> > its catalog database frequently during a backup, that would cause disk
> > thrashing and greatly affect performance.
> >
> 
> Exactly.
>

so, would it be considered a 'best practice' to have the catalog database 
server that is on
a separate machine that the bacula server?

-- michael
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
SourcForge Community
SourceForge wants to tell your story.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users