Bacula-users
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 performance?

2008-05-23 05:25:26
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 performance?
From: "John Drescher" <drescherjm AT gmail DOT com>
To: "Martin Simmons" <martin AT lispworks DOT com>
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 05:25:20 -0400 
> You should use /dev/urandom on Linux, because /dev/random will continually
> block until the kernel's entropy buffer is full.  Even /dev/urandom might be a
> bit slow though.
>
For me (on 64 bit gentoo) the speed of /dev/random and /dev/urandom
was much slower than 35 MB/s so this could not be used.

John

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 performance?, Martin Simmons
Next by Date:  Re: [Bacula-users] bconsole curses problems, Martin Simmons
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 performance?, Martin Simmons
Next by Thread:  Re: [Bacula-users] LTO-4 performance?, Simon Gray
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]