Re: [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations & Complaints Using BackupPC for 5 months
2010-04-22 19:10:54
On 4/22/2010 5:44 PM, Gerald Brandt wrote:
>>> ----- "Les Mikesell"<lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
>>>> That's partly from being implemented in perl and partly from
>>>> counting
>>>> iowait as CPU. Do you have the --checksum-seed=32761 option
>>>> enabled for
>>>> rsync?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Not to hijack the thread, but I know what checksum-seed does, but how
>>> does it help?
>>
>> If it is enabled, the backuppc server side will cache the block
>> checksums and not have to repeat the read/uncompress/compute activity
>> for every run. See the section on "Rsync checksum caching" in
>> http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/faq/BackupPC.html. Note that (a) it
>> doesn't help until the 3rd full backup and (b) a small configurable
>> percentage is still computed to detect archive corruption.
>>
>
> But it's still guaranteed to do a proper backup?
Yes, the saved pre-computed checksums on the server will still be
correct and are just used to identify the matching portions on the
target. If the target file has changed, it will be copied.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell AT gmail DOT com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki: http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [BackupPC-users] Noted Observations & Complaints Using BackupPC for 5 mon, (continued)
|
|
|