BackupPC-users

[BackupPC-users] rsync incrementals MUCH slower than fulls?

2010-04-20 16:25:49
Subject: [BackupPC-users] rsync incrementals MUCH slower than fulls?
From: SirGe <backuppc-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>
To: backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 09:34:54 -0400
I am a backupPC newb looking for troubleshooting clues.

I have a backupPC server backing up a couple of remote filesystems using rsync 
over ssh ($sshPath -q -x -i /etc/backuppc/rsync_backup_rsa -l backuppc $host 
$rsyncPath $argList+). The filesystems total about 1.5 GB. Rsync_args include 
--bwlimit 200 to avoid flooding the link.

My incrementals are taking over an hour, fulls (after the first one are running 
under 5 min. The filesystems are pretty static - 2-5 users editing docs.

Some of the file systems are also being backed up over SMB (from earlier 
config), which shows normal behavior (fast incrementals).

I would appreciate any hints for figuring out why my incrementals are taking so 
long.

+----------------------------------------------------------------------
|This was sent by backupcentral AT gleizer DOT net via Backup Central.
|Forward SPAM to abuse AT backupcentral DOT com.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [BackupPC-users] rsync incrementals MUCH slower than fulls?, SirGe <=