Gerald Brandt schrieb:
> 
> > 
> > I think I've to look for a different solution, I just can't imagine a 
> > pool with > 10 TB. 
> > 
> > 
> > > * I have recently taken my DRBD mirror off-line and copied the BackupPC 
> > > directory structure to both XFS-without-DRBD and an EXT4 file system for 
> > > testing. Performance of the XFS file system was not much different 
> > > with, or without DRBD (a fat fiber link helps there). The first 
> > > traversal of the pool on the EXT4 partition is about 66% through the 
> > > pool traversal after about 96 hours. 
> > 
> > nice ;) 
> 
> You may want to look at this thread 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/backuppc-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT 
> net/msg17234.html 

I've seen this thread, but the pool sizes there are max. in the lower
TB region.

Ralf

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval
Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/