BackupPC-users

Re: [BackupPC-users] Full backups manually, incremental backups automatically

2008-07-15 07:01:53
Subject: Re: [BackupPC-users] Full backups manually, incremental backups automatically
From: Adam Goryachev <mailinglists AT websitemanagers.com DOT au>
To: Jonas von Poser <Jonas.vonPoser AT carano DOT de>
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:01:43 +1000
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jonas von Poser wrote:
> Hi everybody,
> 
> I have a question that I could not find an answer to in the BackupPC
> docs: I'm using BackupPC very successfully in a network of about 20
> Linux servers. Now we want to include our user's laptops in the backup
> plan but have run into some problems.
> 
> First of all is rsync under Vista, which we avoided by using SMB/tar.
> Now our only worry is bandwidth: the backups are using so much bandwidth
> that user's are not able to work anymore. First we throttled the backups
> using trickle but then full backups take longer than a working day.
> Since SMB/tar can't reuse a partial backup, that doesn't work for us.
> 
> We decided to have users start the (long-running) full backups by hand
> when they're going to lunch and only have the incrementals run
> automatically every day. Is there any way of achieving this? Best of all
> would be if BackupPC could send an email when it's time for a full
> backup again.
> 
> Thanks in advance for any pointers and kudos for a great application!

Not sure what trickle does, but I assume it reduces the amount of
bandwidth for your backup. I would suggest that you could do this, but
allow it much more bandwidth. ie, around 70% of the available bandwidth,
so it doesn't take too long, and also it doesn't saturate your network.

Secondly, if you run a full backup of each machine on a different
day/time, then it should eventually even out across the day/week.

Finally, increase the configuration for FullPeriod so that it will only
run a full every 21 days (for example) then tell the people they should
run a backup every week manually. You will probably find that nobody
will manually run the backup, but the longer full period should allow
the recurring backups be less likely to happen at the same time. Now
everyone is happy, except that people don't run full backups as often as
they 'should' :)

Hope that adds some insight to the possibilities for you.

PS, any reason rsync is a no go under vista ? This in my opinion would
be the best solution by a long shot !

Regards,
Adam

- --
Adam Goryachev
Website Managers
www.websitemanagers.com.au
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIfIOXGyoxogrTyiURAsITAKCxIn482vOhmmsYYYte1gAhXTwmTQCgk1ZU
J+vzweZDnt1e0duy22iZc30=
=AFXF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
BackupPC-users mailing list
BackupPC-users AT lists.sourceforge DOT net
List:    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Wiki:    http://backuppc.wiki.sourceforge.net
Project: http://backuppc.sourceforge.net/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>