Re: Changed behavior of amflush, going to background?
2008-04-18 12:24:13
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:40 AM, Zembower, Kevin <kzembowe AT jhuccp DOT org>
wrote:
> One way the documentation might be improved would be to include this
> problem as an example, for instance:
> # Flushes to tape, then ejects tape, all in background:
> echo 'amflush -b -f daily && mt offline' | at now
Thanks! It's in review, and should be committed shortly.
Dustin
--
Storage Software Engineer
http://www.zmanda.com
|
|
|