--- Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com> a écrit :

> On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:23:56AM +0200, tanguy
> yoann wrote:
> >
> > After, the login and the password are take in the
> file
> > amandapass. There is no problem on that.
> > The problem is that I have the same data on the
> two
> > shares and the backup are different.
> > The level 0 is the same but the level 1 is
> different. 
> > However, I add the same file to the two shares.
> > 
> > //Yoann.neotip/backup level 1: 255 KB
> > //Yoann.neotip/backup1 level 1: 6804 KB
> > 
> > The backup of the second share is full. Why?
> 
> Seven MB, small share.  Likely for testing?

Indeed I'm in testing time.
> 
> I'm probably going to show my great ignorance of
> PC's here,
> but what the heck.
> 
> When long ago I was looking at the code or the docs
> something
> I recall was that samba (or amanda) uses the PC file
> system's
> ?archive bit? to determine if a file needs an
> incremental or
> not.  The dependency on this two-state "bit" is why
> you can't
> do levels of incrementals.
> 
> Perhaps on the one system something other than
> amanda/samba
> prevents (or causes) this archive bit to flip.  That
> would
> be analogous to "touch"ing a file on a unix system
> and
> making the file look like it needs backup.

Yes, amanda use the bit archive to know who data
backup. I have a problem with some shares but I can't
know the value of the archive bit of these shares. I
don't know how I can do ?

Thanks a lot for your explanations.

Regards.




Yoann, TANGUY
Student at ESINSA
Sophia-Antipolis


        

        
                
___________________________________________________________________________ 
Appel audio GRATUIT partout dans le monde avec le nouveau Yahoo! Messenger 
Téléchargez cette version sur http://fr.messenger.yahoo.com