On Fri, Jul 08, 2005 at 10:47:25PM +0200, MATILDA MATILDA wrote:
> Hi guys,
> 
> taking the following two statements:
> 
> > >> Seems to me that your desired behavior would be reasonable.
> >Agreed, safety and time make it undesireable to my thinking.
> 
> I have to conclude:
> 1) The current behaviour is "normal" and more or less intended.  ;-)

I'd not say 'intended'.  More like most sites only use a single tape
for each run and lots of sites don't use amverify regularly.  Together
that means not a lot of sites have hit the problem and none to date
reported it as a complaint.

> 2) At the moment there is no amanda inherent solution to my problem.

Think that is correct.

> 3) My wish concerning error reporting is not too strange.

Not at all.

> 
> So my question now: Is there an solution in sight or can it be implemented?
> 

Soon as you or someone else takes an interest to change the code.
Either tomorrow or sometime next year :)

As Stefan so often says APAW.

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)