Amanda-Users

Re: largest fit peculiarities

2005-04-29 11:18:39
Subject: Re: largest fit peculiarities
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <monitor AT oops.co DOT at>
To: Amanda Users <amanda-users AT amanda DOT org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 17:07:32 +0200
Hi, Jon,

on Freitag, 29. April 2005 at 15:17 you wrote to amanda-users:

>> Actually falls back to "first" (in the queue).  But by Murphy's Law
>> that image rarely fits in the small unknown gap before the Real End
>> Of Tape.

JL> Is there a reason to not use "smallest", giving best chance to fit?

AFAI understand the patch, it does use "smallest".

>> I haven't had yet the time to download and install 2.4.5.  Maybe
>> it's already included in there.

No, at least I can't see it ;-)

>> If not, I would be very happy this
>> is included in the next version.  It really helps filling a tape
>> to the last byte (and saves me a tape each day).

JL> Sounds like a good addition.

Patch against 2.4.5 welcome, as always.

-- 
best regards,
Stefan

Stefan G. Weichinger
mailto:monitor AT oops.co DOT at





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>