Re: streaming
2004-06-02 19:15:30
--On Wednesday, June 02, 2004 18:48:46 -0400 Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT
com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 04:21:35PM -0600, Glenn English wrote:
>> On Wed, 2004-06-02 at 14:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>
>> > Any current ide drive can do 30+ Mb/sec if left
>> > alone by other tasks, often quite a ways on the + side.
>>
>> Is that just a burst out of the cache, or can they read dis-contiguous
>> files, seek around to other files, wait for latency, and write all at
>> the same time that fast? Or even half that fast? If so, and if Linux and
>> Intel's IDE controllers lose another 25% moving bits around, it'd still
>> be comfortably faster than the tape drive. I think I may have something
>> horribly misconfigured.
>
> On Solaris x86, one thing that terribly degrades IDE disk
> performance is if the driver does not use dma but uses pio mode.
> There are even reports of diagnostic tools saying the drive is
> using dma, but digging deeper determines that pio mode is in use.
>
> I know not how to check or configure the HD driver on linux,
> but it might be something to check.
If it's linux, try using hdparm to verify the modes and speed of your
disk. Like Jon says, a good drive can have terrible performance if
it is running in the wrong mode.
Also, make sure your kernel is using the correct chipset driver
for your IDE controller. On a machine at home I replaced the
motherboard and my disk speeds dropped to under 2MB/sec. I finally
figured out that since I had a different controller than the one I had
compiled in support for, the kernel had dropeed back to generic IDE
support. Rebuilding the kernel with the proper driver made an over 10X
performance boost.
Frank
>
> --
> Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com
> JG Computing
> 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159
> Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-7220 (fax)
--
Frank Smith fsmith AT hoovers DOT com
Sr. Systems Administrator Voice: 512-374-4673
Hoover's Online Fax: 512-374-4501
|
|
|