On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 04:10:52PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Jon LaBadie wrote:
> >
> >If that is the case, why not use taper algo "largest"?
> >
> 
> ... .  Remember, the 
> algorithm only takes into account dumps that are in the holding area at 
> the time sendaflush() is called, namely when a taper becomes idle (I 
> think), not all of the dumps as a whole (which is what I want).


You are correct of course, I was thinking it waited for all dumps
to complete.  New algo's  LARGEST_WAIT, LARGESTFIT_WAIT ... :)

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)