RE: amanda: running forever..update
2003-06-17 11:19:02
Well this time ... I removed the large disk so I could run it a couple
times today and see what numbers I was getting. I also removed the
holding disk since the tape and drives are all on the same machine...
Dump time is down a good bit....
1 more question...what is "estimate time"?
STATISTICS:
Total Full Daily
-------- -------- --------
Estimate Time (hrs:min) 0:32
Run Time (hrs:min) 0:52
Dump Time (hrs:min) 0:20 0:20 0:00
Output Size (meg) 1422.2 1422.2 0.0
Original Size (meg) 1422.2 1422.2 0.0
Avg Compressed Size (%) -- -- --
Filesystems Dumped 6 6 0
Avg Dump Rate (k/s) 1198.4 1198.4 --
Tape Time (hrs:min) 0:20 0:20 0:00
Tape Size (meg) 1422.3 1422.3 0.0
Tape Used (%) 3.7 3.7 0.0
Filesystems Taped 6 6 0
Avg Tp Write Rate (k/s) 1194.5 1194.5 --
USAGE BY TAPE:
Label Time Size % Nb
DailySet1Daily3 0:20 1422.3 3.7 6
NOTES:
taper: tape DailySet1Daily3 kb 1456640 fm 6 [OK]
DUMP SUMMARY:
DUMPER STATS
TAPER STATS
HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS
KB/s
----------------------- ---------------------------------------------
----------------
localhost sda2 0 878130 878144 -- 9:40 1514.3 9:40
1513.0
localhost sda3 0 3830 3840 -- 0:03 1204.4 0:04
904.9
localhost sda7 0 385910 385920 -- 1:36 4005.7 1:37
3981.4
localhost sda8 0 185380 185408 -- 3:31 879.3 3:31
878.6
localhost sda9 0 1990 2016 -- 0:01 1875.8 0:03
771.4
localhost sdb1 0 1100 1120 -- 5:24 3.4 5:24
3.5
(brought to you by Amanda version 2.4.4)
-----Original Message-----
From: Joshua Baker-LePain [mailto:jlb17 AT duke DOT edu]
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:22 AM
To: Michael Packer
Cc: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Subject: Re: amanda: running forever..update
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003 at 8:22am, Michael Packer wrote
> The changes took it from 8+ hours to 4:45.... still would like to get
it
What changes?
> down a bit more... I still have a problem with compsec (made a typo)
so
> I reformatted it by hand.
>
> Questions...
>
> would it be beneficial to break /sda5 down into different disks
> (I was looking at the sample disklist and saw you can do things like
> /sda5/x /sda5/x2 /sda5/x3 ... etc). Currently it's creating 56 500mb
> chunks
>
> is it better not to create these chunks?
*snip*
> Run Time (hrs:min) 4:45
> Dump Time (hrs:min) 2:23 2:23 0:00
*snip*
> HOSTNAME DISK L ORIG-KB OUT-KB COMP% MMM:SS KB/s MMM:SS KB/s
> ----------------- ------------ ------------
> localhost sda2 0 878130 878144 -- 4:29 3264.2 6:17
2327.0
> localhost sda3 0 3830 3840 -- 0:01 3818.4 0:04
927.2
> localhost sda5 0 28012880 28012896 -- 132:42 3518.4 125:34
3718.2
I'm assuming that the tape drive is on localhost? If so, don't even
bother with the holding disk -- it's only slowing you down (see how run
time is roughly 2X dump time). That should get your runs down to
basically the dump time listed above.
--
Joshua Baker-LePain
Department of Biomedical Engineering
Duke University
|
|
|