On Wednesday 30 April 2003 05:55 am, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 08:33:13AM +0200, Liam Pace wrote:
> > no messages are created in /tmp/amanda when I try an amcheck on
the server.
> > The only messages there are is when I manually run amandad on the
client.
> >
> > your help needed cause I'm at a loss with this machine!!
> >
> > thanks
> > liam
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
> > [mailto:owner-amanda-users AT amanda DOT org]On Behalf Of Jon LaBadie
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 6:08 PM
> > To: amanda users
> > Subject: Re: amanda/udp server failing on solaris 8
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2003 at 05:56:21PM +0200, Liam Pace wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a Solaris 8 server with a tape loader and I back up a
number of
> > linux
> > > / solaris machines. However on one solaris 5.8 machine I'm
getting the
> > > following error in /var/adm/messages when I run an amcheck from
the
> > server.
> > > The amanda service is up and running and amanda client seems to
be
> > installed
> > > correctly. Any idea anyone?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Apr 29 17:34:27 searchmalta inetd[191]: [ID 858011
daemon.warning]
> > > /usr/local/libexec/amandad: Hangup
> > > Apr 29 17:34:33 searchmalta last message repeated 38 times
> > > Apr 29 17:34:34 searchmalta inetd[191]: [ID 667328 daemon.error]
> > amanda/udp
> > > server failing (looping), service terminated
> >
> > How about messages in /tmp/amanda ?
> >
> > --
>
> That sounds like it is not starting at all when invoked from inet.
>
> How about typo's in /etc/inet/{services|inetd.conf}
>
> When you made your last change to the above, did you do a 'pkill
-HUP inet'?
I had a similar problem with Solaris 8. I killed and restarted inetd
and amandad started working.
> How about incorrect ownership/permissions on the executables
--
Stephen Carville <stephen AT totalflood DOT com>
UNIX and Network Administrator
DPSI
6033 W. Century Blvd, Ste 1075
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-342-3602
============================================
Well, yes, we've deployed Linux and we're seeing reduced costs and
increased functionality. But our competitors? Linux might be bad for
them. Real bad. Our competitors should stick with what they have
right now.
|
