Amanda-Users

Re: RAIT?

2002-12-24 00:40:14
Subject: Re: RAIT?
From: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>
To: amanda-users AT amanda DOT org
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 00:04:44 -0500
On Tue, Dec 24, 2002 at 03:56:15AM +0000, Adrian Terranova wrote:
> I just noticed the 2.43 RAIT capabilites in the docs directory, and
> wondered if anyone has set this up with decent high capacity drives
> (LTO AIT, SDLT)? (5 x SDLT 160 = ~640GB )
> 
> Is performance 4 x the single drive? (with a 5 drive setup) Is there any 
> significant performance
> penalty for calculating the parity (CPU load/speed)? 
> 
> Are you comfortable with it? Do all of the tools work with it
> (amverify, amrecover, amcheck, amadmin )? In the event of a
> restore/diaster, does the tape drive order matter (ie - lets say a
> restore to another box is required, do I have to have the same tape
> numbers for the drives in the changer configuration, with the tapes
> placed in their respective drives, or can amanda figure out
> data/parity just based upon labels/configuration.)
> 
> Sorry to be such a leach, but I don't have 5 tape drives. (yet) 

When you get them and try it out, be sure to let us know.  :))

-- 
Jon H. LaBadie                  jon AT jgcomp DOT com
 JG Computing
 4455 Province Line Road        (609) 252-0159
 Princeton, NJ  08540-4322      (609) 683-7220 (fax)

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RAIT?, Adrian Terranova
    • Re: RAIT?, Jon LaBadie <=