ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] How to backup ISILON storage

2018-02-08 09:47:03
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] How to backup ISILON storage
From: Zoltan Forray <zforray AT VCU DOT EDU>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 09:44:37 -0500
So you don't have any Windows filesystems on the ISILON? You are a purely
Linux/Unix shop?

On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 9:41 AM, Skylar Thompson <skylar2 AT u.washington DOT 
edu>
wrote:

>  Content preview:  We briefly looked into doing replication, but trying to
> convince
>     our user base (scientists) that they should get several petabytes of
> disk
>     that they couldn't directly use would have been a non-starter. At the
> time
>     we also "only" had 10Gbps Internet connection, and sync'ing upwards of
> 50TB/day
>     would have consumed a substantial part of that uplink. :) [...]
>
>  Content analysis details:   (0.6 points, 5.0 required)
>
>   pts rule name              description
>  ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------
> --------------------
>   0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record
> (neutral)
>  -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD      Envelope sender domain matches handover relay
>                              domain
> X-Barracuda-Connect: mx.gs.washington.edu[128.208.8.134]
> X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1518100866
> X-Barracuda-Encrypted: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384
> X-Barracuda-URL: https://148.100.49.28:443/cgi-mod/mark.cgi
> X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at marist.edu
> X-Barracuda-Scan-Msg-Size: 947
> X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of
> TAG_LEVEL=3.5 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.5 tests=
> X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.47712
>         Rule breakdown below
>          pts rule name              description
>         ---- ---------------------- ------------------------------
> --------------------
>
> We briefly looked into doing replication, but trying to convince our user
> base (scientists) that they should get several petabytes of disk that they
> couldn't directly use would have been a non-starter. At the time we also
> "only" had 10Gbps Internet connection, and sync'ing upwards of 50TB/day
> would have consumed a substantial part of that uplink. :)
>
> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 11:38:30AM +0000, Abbott, Joseph wrote:
> > I agree with Remco 100%.
> > If you can stay away from NDMP.
> > We have a large Isilon environment which we backup with TSM/NDMP. It run
> very long, is absolutely horrific for restores.
> > We are making the switch over to Isilon snapshots and replication both
> native to the Isilon. These solutions outperform TSM/NDMP tenfold.
>
> --
> -- Skylar Thompson (skylar2 AT u.washington DOT edu)
> -- Genome Sciences Department, System Administrator
> -- Foege Building S046, (206)-685-7354
> -- University of Washington School of Medicine
>



--
*Zoltan Forray*
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
Xymon Monitor Administrator
VMware Administrator
Virginia Commonwealth University
UCC/Office of Technology Services
www.ucc.vcu.edu
zforray AT vcu DOT edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email to request that you reply with your password, social
security number or confidential personal information. For more details
visit http://phishing.vcu.edu/


ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC