ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect 8.1 on RHEL cluster

2017-05-23 04:49:00
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect 8.1 on RHEL cluster
From: adsm consulting <adsmcons AT GMAIL DOT COM>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 10:47:33 +0200
@Patrick, we will have also a replication to a third site :)

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 7:44 PM, Patrick Miller <pmiller AT pgcps DOT org> 
wrote:

> Have you considered replication vs clustering?
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Folkerts <
> stefan.folkerts AT gmail DOT com>
> wrote:
>
> > Restore performance is going to be incredible if you have a lot of
> drives,
> > you can practically fill a 10Gb/s connection using 48 nearline drives.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:47 AM, adsm consulting <adsmcons AT gmail DOT 
> > com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Stefan,
> > > not very technical reason, V5030 was already available because an
> Oracle
> > > RAC is just migrated to Flashsystem 900, so we reused it for this new
> > > spectrum protect, instead buy a lower spec storage.
> > > Also performance will better for sure on SAS drives versus NL-SAS.
> > >
> > > JR
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Folkerts <
> > > stefan.folkerts AT gmail DOT com
> > > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > No knowledge about that type of Linux cluster.
> > > > Could you explain why you picked the V5030 over the V5020 and why you
> > are
> > > > going for 15K drives in a system that will use the containerpool?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:48 AM, adsm consulting <adsmcons AT gmail DOT 
> > > > com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > > We are planning to implement spectrum protect 8.1 in RHEL cluster
> > with
> > > 2
> > > > > nodes for HA reason.
> > > > > The shared SAN storage will be a storwize V5030, with disks for
> > > database
> > > > on
> > > > > SSD and SAS15Krpm for directory container storage pools.
> > > > > Also we will have in near feature a TS3310 for copy container for
> in
> > > site
> > > > > protection.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > In the knowledge center there is no configuration examples abount
> > > Redhat
> > > > > Enterprise linux clustering (pacemaker).
> > > > > So I am asking if anybody has made this kind of configuration
> before
> > > me.
> > > > >
> > > > > Blueprint linux 3.1 can give some indication only for standard no
> > > > clustered
> > > > > configuration.
> > > > > Infact for example no LVM configuration is made.
> > > > > One of my question is for example about Database disks:
> > > > > On the storage i will made 4 VDISK (LUN), i shuld put them in
> unique
> > VG
> > > > and
> > > > > split after in 4 LV? Or si prefferred to made 4 VG with 1 LV each?
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you if somebody will share his experience.
> > > > >
> > > > > Greetings.
> > > > >
> > > > > James R.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Patrick L. Miller
> Computer Systems Analyst II
> Prince George's County Schools
> 301-952-6797 pmiller AT pgcps DOT org
>
>  ___________________          _-_
>  \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____
>              \_ \    \----._________.----/
>                \ \   /  /    `-_-'
>            __,--`.`-'..'-_
>           /____          ||  *Systems*
>                `--.____,-'
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC