ADSM-L

Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect 8.1 on RHEL cluster

2017-05-22 13:47:11
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Spectrum Protect 8.1 on RHEL cluster
From: Patrick Miller <pmiller AT PGCPS DOT ORG>
To: ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:44:36 -0400
Have you considered replication vs clustering?

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Stefan Folkerts <stefan.folkerts AT gmail DOT 
com>
wrote:

> Restore performance is going to be incredible if you have a lot of drives,
> you can practically fill a 10Gb/s connection using 48 nearline drives.
>
>
> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:47 AM, adsm consulting <adsmcons AT gmail DOT com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Stefan,
> > not very technical reason, V5030 was already available because an Oracle
> > RAC is just migrated to Flashsystem 900, so we reused it for this new
> > spectrum protect, instead buy a lower spec storage.
> > Also performance will better for sure on SAS drives versus NL-SAS.
> >
> > JR
> >
> > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Stefan Folkerts <
> > stefan.folkerts AT gmail DOT com
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > No knowledge about that type of Linux cluster.
> > > Could you explain why you picked the V5030 over the V5020 and why you
> are
> > > going for 15K drives in a system that will use the containerpool?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 9:48 AM, adsm consulting <adsmcons AT gmail DOT 
> > > com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > > We are planning to implement spectrum protect 8.1 in RHEL cluster
> with
> > 2
> > > > nodes for HA reason.
> > > > The shared SAN storage will be a storwize V5030, with disks for
> > database
> > > on
> > > > SSD and SAS15Krpm for directory container storage pools.
> > > > Also we will have in near feature a TS3310 for copy container for in
> > site
> > > > protection.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > In the knowledge center there is no configuration examples abount
> > Redhat
> > > > Enterprise linux clustering (pacemaker).
> > > > So I am asking if anybody has made this kind of configuration before
> > me.
> > > >
> > > > Blueprint linux 3.1 can give some indication only for standard no
> > > clustered
> > > > configuration.
> > > > Infact for example no LVM configuration is made.
> > > > One of my question is for example about Database disks:
> > > > On the storage i will made 4 VDISK (LUN), i shuld put them in unique
> VG
> > > and
> > > > split after in 4 LV? Or si prefferred to made 4 VG with 1 LV each?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you if somebody will share his experience.
> > > >
> > > > Greetings.
> > > >
> > > > James R.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>



--
Thanks,

Patrick L. Miller
Computer Systems Analyst II
Prince George's County Schools
301-952-6797 pmiller AT pgcps DOT org

 ___________________          _-_
 \==============_=_/ ____.---'---`---.____
             \_ \    \----._________.----/
               \ \   /  /    `-_-'
           __,--`.`-'..'-_
          /____          ||  *Systems*
               `--.____,-'


ADSM.ORG Privacy and Data Security by KimLaw, PLLC